R v McLennan, Raymond [2009] NSWDC 298
The offender pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual intercourse with a person above the age of fourteen and under sixteen; assessment of the seriousness found penile/vaginal intercourse within mid-range and fellatio below mid-range. Sentences were imposed reflecting the criminality, with discounts for the guilty plea, and accumulation for totality. Special circumstances were found due to hardship in custody and rehabilitation prospects; recommendations for offender to participate in CORE programme. Total sentences and non-parole periods precisely set according to these findings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- convicted; sentenced to imprisonment with specified non-parole periods and head sentences; recommendation for CORE programme; potential for parole at discretion of Parole Board; no immediate AVO imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Assault' 'sentencing' 'sexual Intercourse With Person Under 16' 'absence of Consent' 'objective Seriousness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['appropriate sentence for sexual intercourse with a person aged over 14 and under 16' 'assessment of objective criminality' 'impact of plea of guilty on sentencing' 'assessment of subjective circumstances' 'totality of sentencing and special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual intercourse with a person above the age of fourteen and under sixteen; assessment of the seriousness found penile/vaginal intercourse within mid-range and fellatio below mid-range. Sentences were imposed reflecting the criminality, with discounts for the guilty plea, and accumulation for totality. Special circumstances were found due to hardship in custody and rehabilitation prospects; recommendations for offender to participate in CORE programme. Total sentences and non-parole periods precisely set according to these findings.
Court Disposition
convicted; sentenced to imprisonment with specified non-parole periods and head sentences; recommendation for CORE programme; potential for parole at discretion of Parole Board; no immediate AVO imposed
Orders
- ['Count 1: Sexual intercourse with person under 16 - convicted; sentenced to 2 years 7 months and 15 days (discounted from 3 years), non-parole period 18 months from 6 February 2009 to 5 August 2010; balance of term 10 months 15 days to 20 September 2011.' 'Count 2: Sexual intercourse with person under 16...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment