R v Antony Paul Hanney [2014] NSWDC 13
The Court found that the sexual intercourse without consent offence was within the mid-range of objective seriousness with aggravating factors of vulnerability and location, and the indecent assault offence was below the mid-range. Given the offender's early plea and remorse, but the need for deterrence and seriousness of the crimes, partially concurrent terms of imprisonment were imposed, following statutory guidelines and relevant case law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences' 'sentencing' 'indecent Assault']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Determination of appropriate sentence for sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault' 'Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors' 'Application of utilitarian discount, standard non-parole period, and totality principle']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the sexual intercourse without consent offence was within the mid-range of objective seriousness with aggravating factors of vulnerability and location, and the indecent assault offence was below the mid-range. Given the offender's early plea and remorse, but the need for deterrence and seriousness of the crimes, partially concurrent terms of imprisonment were imposed, following statutory guidelines and relevant case law.
Court Disposition
convicted
Orders
- ['Count 1: Sexual intercourse without consent—5 years and 6 months imprisonment (non-parole period 3 years and 6 months from 2 April 2013 to 1 October 2016; balance of sentence 2 years, expiring 1 October 2018)' 'Count 2: Indecent assault—18 months imprisonment commencing 2 October 2012, expiring 1 April 2014,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment