SGSB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1612

SGSB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1612

The Tribunal did not exceed its jurisdiction or err in law as alleged by the applicant; any alleged errors would not constitute jurisdictional error due to s 474(1) of the Migration Act; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: SGSB; Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error, Well Founded Fear of Persecution
Migration Law Administrative Law Protection Visa Jurisdictional Error Well Founded Fear of Persecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SGSB

Applicant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in affirming the refusal of the protection visa
  2. 2 Whether the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution for a Convention reason at the time of the Tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not exceed its jurisdiction or err in law as alleged by the applicant; any alleged errors would not constitute jurisdictional error due to s 474(1) of the Migration Act; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicant pay to the respondent costs of the application.