R v Salameh [2016] NSWSC 930

R v Salameh [2016] NSWSC 930

The applicant did not show cause why his continued detention was not justified, taking into account the strength of the Crown case, the seriousness of the offences, the likelihood the applicant would not comply with bail conditions, and the limitations of electronic monitoring.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Applicant: Shadi Salameh
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Decision on Bail Application
Outcome
Bail refused
Legal Topics
Bail, Serious Reoffending, Cause Requirement, Electronic Monitoring
Criminal Law Bail Serious Reoffending Cause Requirement Electronic Monitoring

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Shadi Salameh

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Bail Application / Decision on Bail Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown cause why his continued detention is not justified under s 16A of the Bail Act 2013
  2. 2 Whether electronic monitoring and other conditions could sufficiently mitigate risks associated with releasing the applicant on bail

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not show cause why his continued detention was not justified, taking into account the strength of the Crown case, the seriousness of the offences, the likelihood the applicant would not comply with bail conditions, and the limitations of electronic monitoring.

Court Disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • Bail is refused.