Qasim v Owners Strata Plan 61034 [2022] NSWSC 1604

Qasim v Owners Strata Plan 61034 [2022] NSWSC 1604

The application for adjournment was refused as the evidence provided was inadequate and there was no utility in granting an adjournment. The dictates of justice are not served by acceding to the application, given the proceedings' significant history and clear instructions provided to the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Summons / Adjournment Application
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
['adjournment' 'overriding Purpose' 'case Management']
['civil Procedure'] ['adjournment' 'overriding Purpose' 'case Management']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summons / Adjournment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's oral application for adjournment should be granted"]

Ratio Decidendi

The application for adjournment was refused as the evidence provided was inadequate and there was no utility in granting an adjournment. The dictates of justice are not served by acceding to the application, given the proceedings' significant history and clear instructions provided to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • ['The application for adjournment is refused.']