Lemme v Yassa [2022] NSWSC 592
Given the plaintiff's lack of means, inability to secure other legal assistance, ongoing homelessness, and the complexity of the case, referral for pro bono legal assistance is in the interests of justice under r 7.36 of the UCPR.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Shanan Lemme; First Defendant: Amir Yassa; Second Defendant: Mala Professional Services Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application for Referral to Pro Bono Panel
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Referral to Pro Bono Panel, Legal Assistance, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules R 7.36
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shanan Lemme
Plaintiff
Amir Yassa
First Defendant
Mala Professional Services Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Referral to Pro Bono Panel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be referred to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance under r 7.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
Given the plaintiff's lack of means, inability to secure other legal assistance, ongoing homelessness, and the complexity of the case, referral for pro bono legal assistance is in the interests of justice under r 7.36 of the UCPR.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant referred to Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance.
- Assistance may include advice on proceedings, settling evidence, and conduct of proceedings generally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment