Boyes v Thomson [2024] NSWSC 1325
The plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant adopted a nuisance or is liable for damages or should be compelled to carry out works. The defendant took reasonable steps to address water runoff, and there is insufficient evidence of ongoing material and unreasonable interference. No recoverable loss was established.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Frank Ralph Boyes; Second Plaintiff: Sheena Elizabeth Boyes; Defendant: Shane David Thomson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Real Property List / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Statement of claim dismissed; costs awarded to defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Private Nuisance, Stormwater Drainage, Remedies, Injunction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frank Ralph Boyes
First Plaintiff
Sheena Elizabeth Boyes
Second Plaintiff
Shane David Thomson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Real Property List / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether stormwater ingress from uphill neighbouring property constitutes a private nuisance
- 2 Whether defendant has continued or adopted the nuisance
- 3 Whether loss suffered and damages recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant adopted a nuisance or is liable for damages or should be compelled to carry out works. The defendant took reasonable steps to address water runoff, and there is insufficient evidence of ongoing material and unreasonable interference. No recoverable loss was established.
Court Disposition
Statement of claim dismissed; costs awarded to defendant.
Orders
- Further Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed.
- Plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment