Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Dowling [2019] NSWSC 1173
The judge held that his limited, casual, public professional acquaintance with Mr Bruce McWilliam and Dr Nicky McWilliam could not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias under the Ebner test. The discovery and interrogatory orders sought by the defendant were refused as they were impermissibly broad, irrelevant, unspecified as to time, not directed to facts in issue, and, where relevant, directed to non-parties or matters of mere credit, failing to meet the necessity requirements of the applicable procedural rules.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Seven Network (Operations) Limited ACN 052 845 262; Second Plaintiff: Seven West Media Limited ACN 053 480 845; Defendant: Shane Dowling
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Civil Proceedings (contempt) / Interlocutory Application (disqualification, Discovery, Interrogatories)
- Outcome
- Defendant's applications for recusal, discovery, and interrogatories dismissed; costs ordered against defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Apprehended Bias, Interlocutory Applications, Discovery, Interrogatories, Judicial Recusal, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seven Network (Operations) Limited ACN 052 845 262
First Plaintiff
Seven West Media Limited ACN 053 480 845
Second Plaintiff
Shane Dowling
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Civil Proceedings (contempt) / Interlocutory Application (disqualification, Discovery, Interrogatories)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge should recuse himself for apprehended bias
- 2 Whether discovery and interrogatories sought by the defendant are necessary for the resolution of real issues in dispute
Ratio Decidendi
The judge held that his limited, casual, public professional acquaintance with Mr Bruce McWilliam and Dr Nicky McWilliam could not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias under the Ebner test. The discovery and interrogatory orders sought by the defendant were refused as they were impermissibly broad, irrelevant, unspecified as to time, not directed to facts in issue, and, where relevant, directed to non-parties or matters of mere credit, failing to meet the necessity requirements of the applicable procedural rules.
Court Disposition
Defendant's applications for recusal, discovery, and interrogatories dismissed; costs ordered against defendant.
Orders
- The defendant's application that the judge should disqualify himself is dismissed.
- Paragraphs 6 to 15 of the defendant's notice of motion filed 2 July 2019 are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment