Doe v Dowling [2017] NSWSC 1037
The appropriate penalty for Mr Dowling's deliberate, repeated, and unrepentant contempt of court, in breach of explicit court orders of which he was fully aware, is a fixed term of imprisonment, as no lesser penalty would serve the aims of deterrence, denunciation, and the protection of the authority of the courts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Sentencing for Contempt of Court / Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of four months.
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'sentencing' 'suppression Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentencing for Contempt of Court / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate penalty for contempt of court committed by the contemnor through breach of court orders?' "Whether the contemnor's culpability is reduced because the orders are liable to be set aside?" 'What aggravating or mitigating factors are relevant in sentencing for contempt?']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate penalty for Mr Dowling's deliberate, repeated, and unrepentant contempt of court, in breach of explicit court orders of which he was fully aware, is a fixed term of imprisonment, as no lesser penalty would serve the aims of deterrence, denunciation, and the protection of the authority of the courts.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of four months.
Orders
- ['Shane Dowling sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of four months commencing on 10 August 2017 and expiring on 9 December 2017.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment