Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Dowling (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 1371
It is appropriate to make a specified gross sum costs order for $152,156.86 in favour of the plaintiffs as the defendant's conduct directly and substantially contributed to the incurring of costs, the material supports the amount sought, no challenge established unreasonableness, and formal assessment would cause unnecessary further expense with little benefit given the defendant is unlikely to pay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application After Contempt Finding / Final Disposition of Costs Application
- Outcome
- Gross sum costs order granted in favour of the plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'gross Sum Costs Order' 'contempt of Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application After Contempt Finding / Final Disposition of Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it is appropriate to make a specified gross sum (lump sum) costs order instead of assessed costs in the circumstances of the case.']
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to make a specified gross sum costs order for $152,156.86 in favour of the plaintiffs as the defendant's conduct directly and substantially contributed to the incurring of costs, the material supports the amount sought, no challenge established unreasonableness, and formal assessment would cause unnecessary further expense with little benefit given the defendant is unlikely to pay.
Court Disposition
Gross sum costs order granted in favour of the plaintiffs.
Orders
- ["Order the defendant to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the contempt motion filed on 21 July 2017 in the gross sum of $152,156.86."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment