Regina v JAQUES [2002] NSWCCA 444
The sentencing judge erred by placing undue weight on the severity of the applicant's remarks and prior convictions, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence; a lesser sentence of periodic detention was appropriate given the circumstances of the offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'threatening Reprisal Against Judicial Officer' 'sentencing Discretion' 'weight of Previous Convictions' 'seriousness of Offence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' "Whether undue weight was given to the applicant's previous record and circumstances of the offence" 'Whether alternative sentencing options should have been considered']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by placing undue weight on the severity of the applicant's remarks and prior convictions, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence; a lesser sentence of periodic detention was appropriate given the circumstances of the offence.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentence varied
Orders
- ['Applicant sentenced to 12 months periodic detention commencing from acceptance within a place, if available, within 7 days from the date of the judgment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment