Partington v R [2009] NSWCCA 232

Partington v R [2009] NSWCCA 232

The admission of LB's opinion evidence about events she did not directly perceive (on the other side of the door) was not necessary to obtain an adequate account or understanding of her perception for purposes of s 78 of the Evidence Act 1995 and should not have been admitted; its admission on a critical issue...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Shane John Partington; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
Legal Topics
Opinion Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Lay Opinion, Evidence Act 1995 S 78, Application for Discharge of Jury, Manslaughter Conviction
Criminal Law Opinion Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Lay Opinion Evidence Act 1995 S 78 Application for Discharge of Jury Manslaughter Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shane John Partington

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether opinion evidence of a lay witness was admissible under s 78 of the Evidence Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether the jury should have been discharged after admission of inadmissible opinion evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The admission of LB's opinion evidence about events she did not directly perceive (on the other side of the door) was not necessary to obtain an adequate account or understanding of her perception for purposes of s 78 of the Evidence Act 1995 and should not have been admitted; its admission on a critical issue compromised the fairness of the trial, requiring conviction to be quashed and a new trial ordered.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.

Orders

  • Appeal upheld and the conviction quashed.
  • Direct a new trial on the count of manslaughter.