Regina v Shane Michael Franklin [2005] NSWCCA 24
The sentence imposed was within the relevant range for the offence considering the aggravating and mitigating factors, including the applicant's guilty plea, progress toward rehabilitation, and the seriousness of the victim's injuries; leave to appeal granted, but appeal dismissed as no lesser sentence was warranted in law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'maliciously Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm' 'discount for Utilitarian Value of Plea of Guilty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentence imposed was excessive given findings regarding the victim's aggression" 'Whether sufficient discount was given for the guilty plea' "Whether sufficient weight was given to elapsed time and applicant's rehabilitation" 'Whether the objective criminality was assessed correctly and sufficient weight given to mitigating factors']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was within the relevant range for the offence considering the aggravating and mitigating factors, including the applicant's guilty plea, progress toward rehabilitation, and the seriousness of the victim's injuries; leave to appeal granted, but appeal dismissed as no lesser sentence was warranted in law.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment