Scholte v Rex [2023] NSWCCA 318
The aggregate sentence imposed by the sentencing judge did not give effect to his stated intention regarding concurrency and accumulation, constituting an error of law requiring appellate intervention and resentencing.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shane Nathan Scholte; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal and Resentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Aggregate Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Accumulation and Concurrency of Sentences, Personal Circumstances in Sentencing, Error in Sentencing Methodology
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shane Nathan Scholte
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal and Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the aggregate sentence imposed was reconcilable with the sentencing judge's stated intentions regarding concurrency and accumulation
- 2 Whether the error in aggregation warranted appellate intervention and resentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed by the sentencing judge did not give effect to his stated intention regarding concurrency and accumulation, constituting an error of law requiring appellate intervention and resentencing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
Orders
- Leave granted to appeal against the sentence imposed on 20 September 2022
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment