Josefski, Shane Stewart v R [2010] NSWCCA 41
Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal dismissed, as the emotional harm suffered by the victim and presence of her child were reasonably foreseeable, and these could be considered as aggravating factors. Both sentences for break and enter and robbery were within the permissible range and not manifestly...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shane Stewart Josefski; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is granted, appeal is dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Aggravating Factors, Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Parity, Foreseeable Consequences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shane Stewart Josefski
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether offender is punishable for unforeseen results of offence
- 2 Whether sentence was manifestly excessive
- 3 Whether the court should interfere to correct disparity due to co-offender's sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal dismissed, as the emotional harm suffered by the victim and presence of her child were reasonably foreseeable, and these could be considered as aggravating factors. Both sentences for break and enter and robbery were within the permissible range and not manifestly excessive. Disparity due to co-offender's manifestly inadequate sentence was not a basis to adjust the applicant's sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is granted, appeal is dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment