R v McKellar [2014] NSWSC 104
The indictment was appropriate because the murder count had to be presented in the Supreme Court, related counts could be included subject to the usual practice as to joinder, count one was closely related to the murder count, and count three could remain where the accused did not object and the indictment had long been before the Court; the indictment was consistent with the applicable legislation, regulation, and Practice Note.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Special Hearing / Procedural Ruling on Whether the Special Hearing May Proceed on the Indictment Presented
- Outcome
- The special hearing may proceed on the indictment presented.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'special Hearing' 'indictment' 'joinder of Counts' 'supreme Court Criminal Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Special Hearing / Procedural Ruling on Whether the Special Hearing May Proceed on the Indictment Presented
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it was appropriate for the Supreme Court to hear an indictment containing murder and additional counts not generally heard in the Supreme Court.' 'Whether count three could remain on the indictment where its evidential foundation was somewhat divorced from the murder and armed robbery counts.']
Ratio Decidendi
The indictment was appropriate because the murder count had to be presented in the Supreme Court, related counts could be included subject to the usual practice as to joinder, count one was closely related to the murder count, and count three could remain where the accused did not object and the indictment had long been before the Court; the indictment was consistent with the applicable legislation, regulation, and Practice Note.
Court Disposition
The special hearing may proceed on the indictment presented.
Orders
- ['The special hearing may proceed on the indictment presented.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment