Kennedy v Sutherland Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 1564
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the applicant's written request pursuant to clause 4.6 adequately establishes sufficient environmental planning grounds justifying the breach in the height development standard, the departure is minor, consistent with relevant objectives, and no adverse impacts occur.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shannon Kennedy; Applicant: Cherie Kennedy; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Height Development Standard, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shannon Kennedy
Applicant
Cherie Kennedy
Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted notwithstanding contravention of height development standard
- 2 Whether the amended application meets jurisdictional preconditions for approval
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the applicant's written request pursuant to clause 4.6 adequately establishes sufficient environmental planning grounds justifying the breach in the height development standard, the departure is minor, consistent with relevant objectives, and no adverse impacts occur.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- Leave granted to rely on amended architectural and landscape plans set out in Condition 1 of Annexure A
- The applicant's written request under clause 4.6 regarding the height of buildings development standard under clause 4.3 is upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment