Regina v Shannon Ryan [1999] NSWCCA 432
While the original sentences were not manifestly excessive, the later reduction in the co-offender’s sentence required a corresponding reduction for the applicant to avoid unjustifiable disparity and maintain parity between co-offenders.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Applicant: Shannon Ryan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentences quashed; substituted sentences imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Parity of Sentencing, Breaking, Entering and Stealing, Receiving Stolen Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Shannon Ryan
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the applicant were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether, in light of the reduced sentence for a co-offender, parity required reduction of the applicant's sentence
Ratio Decidendi
While the original sentences were not manifestly excessive, the later reduction in the co-offender’s sentence required a corresponding reduction for the applicant to avoid unjustifiable disparity and maintain parity between co-offenders.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentences quashed; substituted sentences imposed.
Orders
- For each contravention of s.188 of the Crimes Act 1900, the applicant is sentenced to penal servitude for a fixed term of 1 year and 6 months, to commence on 11 August 1998 and to expire on 10 February 2000.
- For each contravention of s.112(1) of the Crimes Act 1900, the applicant is sentenced to penal servitude for 3 years and 6 months, divided between a minimum term of 1 year and 6 months to commence on 11 August 1998 and to expire on 10 February 2000, and an additional term of 2 years to commence on 11 February 2000,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment