Liao v Zhu [2008] NSWSC 28
The plaintiff failed because any oral contract binding the parties was for distribution in accordance with share allotments or entitlements in the second defendant, and the plaintiff held no shares. The claim sued upon was therefore not made out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Claim for Payment Under Alleged Agreement Concerning Proceeds of SOCOG Proceedings / Principal Judgment; Hearing in Absence of Defendants
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['oral Agreement' 'commission to Sub Agent' 'termination of Head Agency Contract' 'distribution of Judgment Proceeds According to Share Entitlements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contract Claim for Payment Under Alleged Agreement Concerning Proceeds of SOCOG Proceedings / Principal Judgment; Hearing in Absence of Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff established an enforceable agreement entitling him to payment from the proceeds of the first defendant's proceedings against SOCOG." 'Whether any agreement for distribution according to share allotments or entitlements gave the plaintiff a claim where he held no shares in the second defendant.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed because any oral contract binding the parties was for distribution in accordance with share allotments or entitlements in the second defendant, and the plaintiff held no shares. The claim sued upon was therefore not made out.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Orders
- ['Order that the proceedings be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment