Zhao v City of Ryde Council [2023] NSWLEC 1790
The appeal is upheld and consent is granted to the amended development application as the proposal, facilitated by the conservation incentives provision, meets the requirements of the relevant planning instruments and does not detract from the heritage significance of the item.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shaohui Zhao; Respondent: City of Ryde Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Dual Occupancy, Heritage Conservation, Strata Subdivision, Environmental Planning, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaohui Zhao
Applicant
City of Ryde Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conservation incentives under cl 5.10(10) of RLEP permit the otherwise prohibited dual occupancy (detached) development due to heritage listing
- 2 Whether the proposal complies with relevant planning controls and environmental legislation
- 3 Effect of the development on the heritage significance of the listed item
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and consent is granted to the amended development application as the proposal, facilitated by the conservation incentives provision, meets the requirements of the relevant planning instruments and does not detract from the heritage significance of the item.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- The applicant is directed to file the amended development application as approved by Council and set out in Annexure A within seven (7) days of the date of this order.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment