Coeur De Lion Investments Pty Limited v The President's Club Limited [2020] FCA 462
The application was dismissed; the questions in issue were addressed in the reasons published in Coeur De Lion Investments Pty Limited v The President's Club Limited [2020] FCA 456, which were to be read with these reasons.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Restrain the Respondents From Conducting or Taking Steps in Connection With a General Meeting of Shareholders of the First Respondent Pursuant to S 260 B of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Judgment and Orders on Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['shareholder Meeting' 'shareholder Approval' 'levies' 'representative Proceeding Funding' 'injunctive Restraint']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Restrain the Respondents From Conducting or Taking Steps in Connection With a General Meeting of Shareholders of the First Respondent Pursuant to S 260 B of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Judgment and Orders on Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents should be restrained from taking further steps in connection with giving notice of, calling or holding a general meeting of shareholders of the first respondent pursuant to s 260B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the respondents should be required to revoke any notice given to shareholders of the first respondent or to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in connection with the proposed meeting.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed; the questions in issue were addressed in the reasons published in Coeur De Lion Investments Pty Limited v The President's Club Limited [2020] FCA 456, which were to be read with these reasons.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' 'The costs of and incidental to the application are reserved for later determination.' 'Pursuant to s 23 and s 37P of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), rule 1.32 and rule 1.36 of the Federal Court Rules 2011, these orders and the reasons for judgment in support of these...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment