Coombs v Ballina Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 294
The applicant failed to discharge the onus of showing that a dwelling house existed on the land immediately before 27 February 1987. In the absence of evidence as to when the house was removed, clause 12(3A) does not apply and the application cannot succeed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Preliminary/separate Questions on Entitlement to Dwelling Approval
- Outcome
- application dismissed; questions answered in the negative; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'dwelling Entitlement' 'minimum Allotment Size' 'existing Use Rights']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Preliminary/separate Questions on Entitlement to Dwelling Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the subject land is entitled to existing use rights pursuant to s 108 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the subject land is entitled to the benefit of clause 12(3A) of the Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987 for the purposes of a dwelling house']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to discharge the onus of showing that a dwelling house existed on the land immediately before 27 February 1987. In the absence of evidence as to when the house was removed, clause 12(3A) does not apply and the application cannot succeed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed; questions answered in the negative; no order as to costs
Orders
- ['No order as to costs' 'Exhibits may be returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment