Gertos v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 517
The applicant, having benefitted from the opportunity to submit amended plans rather than facing refusal, should pay the additional legal costs incurred by the council as a direct result of considering the revised plans.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment Following Amended Plans and Costs Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant to pay additional legal costs to council, subject to Acting Chief Judge's concurrence.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'costs in Planning Proceedings' 'amendment of Plans']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment Following Amended Plans and Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs of the amendment to plans should be paid by applicant' 'Whether consent should be granted based on amended plans']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, having benefitted from the opportunity to submit amended plans rather than facing refusal, should pay the additional legal costs incurred by the council as a direct result of considering the revised plans.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant to pay additional legal costs to council, subject to Acting Chief Judge's concurrence.
Orders
- ['Development consent granted subject to conditions.' "Applicant to pay respondent's additional legal costs of $5,728.15 incurred after adjournment, subject to concurrence of Acting Chief Judge." 'Such sum to be paid within 60 days of the provision of the written orders, with opportunity for parties to make...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment