Michael S.S. v Monitronix Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 737
Given the related proceedings and the interests of justice, the proceeding must be transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia under section 5 of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shawky Shafeek Michael; Applicant: Joyce Mary Michael; First Respondent: Monitronix Limited (In Liquidation); Second Respondent: Bernard William Ridgeway; Second Respondent: David Christopher Nicolson; Second Respondent: Graham Charles Sylvester
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Transfer Proceedings / Ruling on Transfer Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. Proceeding transferred.
- Legal Topics
- Cross Vesting, Transfer of Proceedings, Stay of Proceedings, Employment Contracts, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shawky Shafeek Michael
Applicant
Joyce Mary Michael
Applicant
Monitronix Limited (In Liquidation)
First Respondent
Bernard William Ridgeway
Second Respondent
David Christopher Nicolson
Second Respondent
Graham Charles Sylvester
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Transfer Proceedings / Ruling on Transfer Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceeding should be transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia under cross-vesting legislation.
- 2 Whether it is more appropriate or in the interests of justice for the Supreme Court to determine the proceeding.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the related proceedings and the interests of justice, the proceeding must be transferred to the Supreme Court of Western Australia under section 5 of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Proceeding transferred.
Orders
- The matter be transferred to the West Australian Supreme Court pursuant to Section 5 of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987.
- Costs of the application be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment