Shayben Construction Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2017] NSWLEC 1026
The appeal is upheld and the development application is approved because the parties reached agreement at conciliation and the Court was satisfied the decision was one within its powers, pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shayben Construction Pty Ltd; Respondent: Georges River Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference With Agreement Reached and Orders Made
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development application approved subject to conditions and plans attached in annexures.
- Legal Topics
- Conciliation Conference, Development Application, Agreement Between Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shayben Construction Pty Ltd
Applicant
Georges River Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference With Agreement Reached and Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the parties could reach an agreement in conciliation under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- 2 Whether the Court should make orders giving effect to the agreement under s 34(3)
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the development application is approved because the parties reached agreement at conciliation and the Court was satisfied the decision was one within its powers, pursuant to s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development application approved subject to conditions and plans attached in annexures.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Application number DA 110/2016 for the proposed construction of an additional 3 levels (7 units) on a residential flat building at 4 St Georges Parade, Hurstville, is approved subject to: (1) conditions contained in Annexure 'A'; (2) plans contained in Annexure 'B'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment