Shekhar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 522
The application was dismissed due to the applicant's non-appearance at the hearing and failure to comply with procedural orders, coupled with the absence of sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge's decision to warrant granting leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shekhar Shekhar; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Visa Refusal, Procedural Fairness, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shekhar Shekhar
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of an application for judicial review of a tribunal decision affirming a delegate's visa refusal
- 2 Whether sufficient doubt exists as to the correctness of the primary judge's decision
- 3 Whether the applicant's non-appearance justifies dismissal of the application
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed due to the applicant's non-appearance at the hearing and failure to comply with procedural orders, coupled with the absence of sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge's decision to warrant granting leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment