Environment Protection Authority V Shell Co of Australia Ltd (No 3) [1999] NSWLEC 288
The statutory presumption in s 12(3) of the EOP Act operates so that the date endorsed on the summons is presumptively the date on which the EPA first had evidence of the offence. The defendant has the legal burden, on the balance of probabilities, to establish an earlier date to defeat the presumption. On the evidence, the defendant did not do so, and proceedings were commenced within time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Environmental Offence Proceedings / Judgment on Strike Out Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Limitation Period' 'onus of Proof' 'statutory Presumption']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Environmental Offence Proceedings / Judgment on Strike Out Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings were commenced within the statutory limitation period under Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 s 12(3)' 'Who bears the onus of establishing the date evidence of the offence came to the attention of the EPA']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory presumption in s 12(3) of the EOP Act operates so that the date endorsed on the summons is presumptively the date on which the EPA first had evidence of the offence. The defendant has the legal burden, on the balance of probabilities, to establish an earlier date to defeat the presumption. On the evidence, the defendant did not do so, and proceedings were commenced within time.
Court Disposition
Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed.
Orders
- ["The Defendant's Notice of Motion for summary dismissal is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment