Boyce v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1592
Because the parties reached agreement at a s 34 conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. 17/0972.01 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Orders Made by Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Refusal Appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'amended Development Application' 'conditional Development Consent' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application No. 17/0972.01 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Orders Made by Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders giving effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979" 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for approval of the amended development application were satisfied' 'Whether Development Application 17/0972.01 for a 2 lot subdivision at 10-12 Tyndall Street, Mittagong NSW should be approved subject to conditions']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement at a s 34 conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure "A".' "The applicant is to pay, within 7 days of this agreement, the respondent's costs of $5,000.00 for assessing the amended proposal." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment