Shellharbour City Council v Rhiannon Rigby & Anor [2006] NSWCA 308

Shellharbour City Council v Rhiannon Rigby & Anor [2006] NSWCA 308

Both the Council and the Club owed and breached their duty of care to the plaintiff by failing to fence off the starting ramp to prevent use by inexperienced riders. The risk to such riders was foreseeable and not negated by the obviousness of BMX risks. Causation of injury was reasonably inferred. Contributory negligence was properly found at 20% due to the plaintiff's youth and conduct, and liability between defendants was appropriately apportioned equally. Sullivan v Gordon damages for care of the plaintiff's child were wrongly awarded and must be deducted. Other damages and findings were within discretionary range. The trial judge gave adequate reasons and did not err in his factual...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal From Supreme Court (common Law Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal and cross-appeal allowed in part; plaintiff's damages reduced by $101,684 (Sullivan v Gordon claim disallowed); verdict for plaintiff in sum of $1,745,852.70; judgment accordingly.
Legal Topics
["occupier's Liability" 'statutory Authorities and Negligence' 'causation' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'appellate Review']
['tort Law' 'personal Injury' 'negligence'] ["occupier's Liability" 'statutory Authorities and Negligence' 'causation' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'appellate Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Cross Appeal From Supreme Court (common Law Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Council and the Club owed and breached a duty of care to the plaintiff in respect of the BMX starting ramp' 'Whether the obviousness of risk negated or limited the duty of care' 'Whether breach of duty was causative of injury' 'Proper apportionment of contributory negligence and liability' "Adequacy of trial judge's reasons and findings" 'Assessment of damages, including for fund management costs']

Ratio Decidendi

Both the Council and the Club owed and breached their duty of care to the plaintiff by failing to fence off the starting ramp to prevent use by inexperienced riders. The risk to such riders was foreseeable and not negated by the obviousness of BMX risks. Causation of injury was reasonably inferred. Contributory negligence was properly found at 20% due to the plaintiff's youth and conduct, and liability between defendants was appropriately apportioned equally. Sullivan v Gordon damages for care of the plaintiff's child were wrongly awarded and must be deducted. Other damages and findings were within discretionary range. The trial judge gave adequate reasons and did not err in his factual...

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross-appeal allowed in part; plaintiff's damages reduced by $101,684 (Sullivan v Gordon claim disallowed); verdict for plaintiff in sum of $1,745,852.70; judgment accordingly.

Orders

  • ['Vary award of damages by deducting $101,684.' 'Verdict for the first respondent/plaintiff in sum of $1,745,852.70 and judgment accordingly.' "Appellant and second respondent/cross-appellant to pay first respondent/plaintiff's costs of appeal and cross-appeal." 'Appellant and second respondent/cross-appellant to...