Zheng v Australian International Aviation College Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1622
The AIAC Report is not 'restricted information' under the TSI Act except in the hands of ATSB, and was freely provided to CASA and others; therefore, its use by the plaintiff and his expert does not contravene section 60, and both the AIAC Report and Simpson Report are not inadmissible by operation of the TSI Act.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Shenglong Zheng; First Defendant: Australian International Aviation College Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Canaan Lawyers Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages / Interlocutory Motions for Advance Ruling on Admissibility
- Outcome
- Advance ruling: AIAC Report and Simpson Report not inadmissible under TSI Act; directions for orders; costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Documents, Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (cth), Restricted Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shenglong Zheng
Plaintiff
Australian International Aviation College Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Canaan Lawyers Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages / Interlocutory Motions for Advance Ruling on Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the AIAC Report contains 'restricted information' within the meaning of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the AIAC Report and its contents are inadmissible
- 3 Whether expert reports relying on the AIAC Report are inadmissible
Ratio Decidendi
The AIAC Report is not 'restricted information' under the TSI Act except in the hands of ATSB, and was freely provided to CASA and others; therefore, its use by the plaintiff and his expert does not contravene section 60, and both the AIAC Report and Simpson Report are not inadmissible by operation of the TSI Act.
Court Disposition
Advance ruling: AIAC Report and Simpson Report not inadmissible under TSI Act; directions for orders; costs awarded.
Orders
- Direct the parties on or before 14 February 2025, to submit to the Court an agreed set of orders.
- If parties are unable to agree on appropriate orders, each party is to submit the orders they contend for by that date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment