Waks and Anor v Marrickville Council [2006] NSWLEC 633
The subdivision pattern in the area must be respected as a determinant element of the urban fabric. The proposed L-shaped subdivision and small lot sizes are out of character with the established subdivision pattern and therefore warrant refusal of consent, even though the built form itself could, with amendments, be compatible with the area.
- Parties
- Applicant: Sheree Waks; Applicant: Borivoj Maksimovic; Respondent: Marrickville Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act / Final Determination
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; development application refused
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Subdivision, Streetscape Presentation, Amenity, Open Space Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sheree Waks
Applicant
Borivoj Maksimovic
Applicant
Marrickville Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed subdivision is consistent with the existing subdivision pattern
- 2 Whether the proposed development is compatible with the streetscape and character of the area
- 3 Whether amenity, open space, and parking requirements are met
Ratio Decidendi
The subdivision pattern in the area must be respected as a determinant element of the urban fabric. The proposed L-shaped subdivision and small lot sizes are out of character with the established subdivision pattern and therefore warrant refusal of consent, even though the built form itself could, with amendments, be compatible with the area.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; development application refused
Orders
- The appeal in respect of the property is dismissed.
- The development application submitted to Marrickville Council and as amended for subdivision into two lots and the erection of two separate dwellings is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment