Sheridan International Pty Limited & Ors v C.S. Brooks Inc. [2005] NSWSC 140

Sheridan International Pty Limited & Ors v C.S. Brooks Inc. [2005] NSWSC 140

The Court held that the issues raised in the motion—whether questions of law could be determined separately, or the cross-claim summarily struck out—were not appropriate for resolution at this stage. All issues raised were at least distinctly arguable and involved unresolved legal or factual uncertainty. The Court declined to order separate determination or strike-out, dismissing the motion.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application on Notice of Motion to Determine Separate Questions/strike Out Cross Claim
Outcome
Motion dismissed.
Legal Topics
['separate Question Determination' 'strike Out Applications' "employer's Indemnity" 'professional Liability' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct']
['commercial Law' 'practice and Procedure' 'equity'] ['separate Question Determination' 'strike Out Applications' "employer's Indemnity" 'professional Liability' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application on Notice of Motion to Determine Separate Questions/strike Out Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the first cross-claim is for indemnity/contribution under s 3 of the Employees Liability Act 1991 (NSW)' "Whether pleaded conduct amounted to 'serious and wilful misconduct' under s 5 of the Employees Liability Act 1991 (NSW)" "Whether conduct occurred 'in the course of, or arose out of, the employment' under s 5" "Whether alleged conduct was 'in trade or commerce' under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)" 'Whether cross-claim is maintainable in law; whether it should be struck out']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the issues raised in the motion—whether questions of law could be determined separately, or the cross-claim summarily struck out—were not appropriate for resolution at this stage. All issues raised were at least distinctly arguable and involved unresolved legal or factual uncertainty. The Court declined to order separate determination or strike-out, dismissing the motion.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The amended notice of motion is dismissed.']