Shi Shi Cindy Lee v Dr Geoffrey Lee Jessica Talbert v Dr Geoffrey Lee & Sue Maree Olsen/Lee. Sue Maree Olsen v Shi Shi Cindy Lee, Jessica Talbert, GP Legal Solicitors [2014] NSWCATCD 181
The Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Ms Olsen's costs application as it was not a Home Building application but simply sought costs in other proceedings. The application was further found to be frivolous, vexatious, misconceived, lacking in substance, and without a tenable basis in fact or law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Building Claim; Costs Application / Costs Application Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'frivolous and Vexatious Litigation' 'tribunal Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Claim; Costs Application / Costs Application Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine the costs application filed by Ms Olsen' 'Whether the costs application is frivolous, vexatious or misconceived']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction to hear Ms Olsen's costs application as it was not a Home Building application but simply sought costs in other proceedings. The application was further found to be frivolous, vexatious, misconceived, lacking in substance, and without a tenable basis in fact or law.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed as frivolous, vexatious and misconceived.' 'The issue of costs in relation to this application is yet to be determined.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment