In the matter of an application by Mellor, Shirley for an inquiry into elections in the Queensland Branch of the Federated Liquor and Allied Industries Employees Union of Australia [1986] FCA 532
Part IX of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 does not attempt to confer non-judicial power on the Court contrary to the judicial power of the Commonwealth. The powers conferred are capable of being judicial and the Court acting within them does not exceed jurisdiction. The objection to jurisdiction fails.
- Parties
- Applicant: Shirley Mellor; Candidate: Elton; Candidate: Hardie; Candidate: Bell; Candidate: Ms. Que; Returning Officer: Australian Electoral Commission; Commissioner: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police; Intervener: Attorney-General for the Commonwealth
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Election Inquiry / Ruling on Jurisdictional Objection/preliminary Argument
- Outcome
- Objection to jurisdiction fails; court will proceed to hear inquiry.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Power of the Commonwealth, Jurisdiction, Registered Organisations, Election Inquiries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shirley Mellor
Applicant
Elton
Candidate
Hardie
Candidate
Bell
Candidate
Ms. Que
Candidate
Australian Electoral Commission
Returning Officer
Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
Commissioner
Attorney-General for the Commonwealth
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Election Inquiry / Ruling on Jurisdictional Objection/preliminary Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry into an election under Part IX of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 2 Whether the conferral of power by Part IX is a valid exercise of judicial power of the Commonwealth
Ratio Decidendi
Part IX of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 does not attempt to confer non-judicial power on the Court contrary to the judicial power of the Commonwealth. The powers conferred are capable of being judicial and the Court acting within them does not exceed jurisdiction. The objection to jurisdiction fails.
Court Disposition
Objection to jurisdiction fails; court will proceed to hear inquiry.
Orders
- The court refuses the objection to jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment