Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 5) [2015] NSWCA 405
All applications and notices of motion were filed out of time without applications for extension; no arguable grounds for judicial review or leave to appeal were presented; the proposed challenges lacked merit, and all proceedings should be dismissed with costs to respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- all applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal against interlocutory costs orders should be granted' 'Whether application for judicial review under Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 should be allowed' 'Whether applications and notice of motion are out of time under relevant rules' 'Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal or judicial review']
Ratio Decidendi
All applications and notices of motion were filed out of time without applications for extension; no arguable grounds for judicial review or leave to appeal were presented; the proposed challenges lacked merit, and all proceedings should be dismissed with costs to respondents.
Court Disposition
all applications dismissed
Orders
- ['The summons and further amended summons seeking leave to appeal are dismissed.' 'The summons seeking judicial review under s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) is dismissed.' 'Notice of Motion filed on 27 November 2015 is dismissed.' "Applicant to pay respondents' costs in each case."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment