Tobin v Shoalhaven City Council [2001] NSWLEC 72
Clause 12(3)(c) of Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 makes a specific exception for prime crop and pasture land in Zone 1(c) and is prohibitive rather than prescriptive: such land must not be subdivided so as to create lots of less than 10 hectares of prime crop and pasture land. Because the subject land was only approximately 2.663 hectares, the required lot size could not be met, subdivision was prohibited, and State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 could not be used to modify the provision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Consent for Subdivision / Preliminary Question of Law
- Outcome
- Clause 12(3)(c) was found to be a prohibition not amenable to State Environmental Planning Policy No.1.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Standards' 'prohibitions on Development' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No.1' 'local Environmental Plan Construction' 'prime Crop and Pasture Land']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Consent for Subdivision / Preliminary Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether clause 12(3) of Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 is in the nature of a development standard or a prohibition.' 'Whether clause 12(3)(c) of Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 is amenable to modification pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No.1.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 12(3)(c) of Shoalhaven Local Environmental Plan 1985 makes a specific exception for prime crop and pasture land in Zone 1(c) and is prohibitive rather than prescriptive: such land must not be subdivided so as to create lots of less than 10 hectares of prime crop and pasture land. Because the subject land was only approximately 2.663 hectares, the required lot size could not be met, subdivision was prohibited, and State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 could not be used to modify the provision.
Court Disposition
Clause 12(3)(c) was found to be a prohibition not amenable to State Environmental Planning Policy No.1.
Orders
- ["The matter will be included in the Registrar's callover list on Friday 27 April 2001." 'The exhibit may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment