McLean v Westpac Banking Corporation [2013] FCA 126
The applicant's proceedings were dismissed as they involved claims and grounds already determined in prior proceedings or which should have been raised there; further, her pleadings failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action and constituted an abuse of process, justifying summary judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Determination and Dismissal of Originating and Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Applicant's originating and interlocutory applications dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['estoppel' 'anshun Estoppel' 'mortgage Enforcement' 'securitisation' 'mc Kenzie Friend' 'summary Judgment' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Determination and Dismissal of Originating and Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant is estopped from raising claims already adjudicated in previous proceedings (Anshun estoppel)' "Whether the applicant's pleadings regarding forgery, unconscionable conduct and 'securitisation' disclose any reasonable cause of action" 'Whether summary judgment is appropriate due to abuse of process and no reasonable prospect of success' 'Appropriate principles regarding the role of a McKenzie Friend']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's proceedings were dismissed as they involved claims and grounds already determined in prior proceedings or which should have been raised there; further, her pleadings failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action and constituted an abuse of process, justifying summary judgment.
Court Disposition
Applicant's originating and interlocutory applications dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["The applicant's originating application filed on 25 October 2012 is dismissed." "The applicant's interlocutory application filed on 17 December 2012 is dismissed." "The applicant is to pay the costs of the application including costs of the respondents' interlocutory application filed on 26 November 2012, to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment