Chen v KPI Hezlett Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 315
The defendant's purported termination of the contract constituted repudiation, which the plaintiff was entitled to accept, entitling the plaintiff to damages representing the difference between the contract price and the value of the land at termination, and the deposit paid.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Real Property / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['sale of Land' 'contract Repudiation' 'damages for Breach of Contract']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Real Property / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant repudiated the contract by purporting to terminate without valid grounds' 'Whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages as a result of the repudiation']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's purported termination of the contract constituted repudiation, which the plaintiff was entitled to accept, entitling the plaintiff to damages representing the difference between the contract price and the value of the land at termination, and the deposit paid.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $175,000 together with interest from 24 June 2022.' "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment