Signorelli Investments Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 419
Neither party should be awarded costs as neither could demonstrate unreasonable conduct or clear entitlement based on success, and the evolution and conduct of the proceedings did not warrant a costs order in favour of either party.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Signorelli Investments Pty Limited; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings / Costs Determination After Substantive Orders
- Outcome
- Each party to pay its own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Class 4 Proceedings, Validity of Place of Public Entertainment Licences, Reasonableness of Parties' Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Signorelli Investments Pty Limited
Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Costs Determination After Substantive Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether either party should be awarded costs in respect of the proceedings relating to the 2001 and 2003 Place of Public Entertainment Licences
- 2 Whether either party acted unreasonably in the conduct of the proceedings justifying a costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Neither party should be awarded costs as neither could demonstrate unreasonable conduct or clear entitlement based on success, and the evolution and conduct of the proceedings did not warrant a costs order in favour of either party.
Court Disposition
Each party to pay its own costs.
Orders
- Each party pay its own costs.
- The exhibits are to be returned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment