Silkfield Pty Ltd v Wong, James & Ors for and on behalf of themselves and as representatives of the group referred to in the application [1998] FCA 1645
The successful appellant is entitled to its costs of the appeal and of the notice of motion to the extent it concerned issues about commencing or continuing as a representative proceeding, due to reversal of the primary judge's determination on these points.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed regarding costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['representative Proceedings' 'costs Orders' 'part IVA Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to costs on appeal' 'Appropriate costs order for notice of motion relating to representative proceedings under Part IVA']
Ratio Decidendi
The successful appellant is entitled to its costs of the appeal and of the notice of motion to the extent it concerned issues about commencing or continuing as a representative proceeding, due to reversal of the primary judge's determination on these points.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed regarding costs.
Orders
- ["Respondents pay appellant's costs of the appeal." 'Costs order of Spender J (16 January 1998) set aside only as it applies to costs of issues raised in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of the notice of motion filed 5 December 1997.' "Respondents pay appellant's costs of and incidental to the said notice of motion...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment