Wirepa v Hill (No. 2) [2023] NSWSC 1654
Indemnity costs are awarded from 4 April 2023 because the first Calderbank letter was a genuine offer of compromise, and rejection of the offer was unreasonable, given the outcome was less favourable to the plaintiff.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Post Dismissal, Costs Variation
- Outcome
- Previous costs order varied to award indemnity costs after 4 April 2023; proceedings dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Letters' 'cost Orders' 'conveyancing Easements' 'compliance With Procedural Requirements']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Post Dismissal, Costs Variation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded based on Calderbank letters' 'Effectiveness of the first Calderbank letter' 'Reasonableness of rejecting Calderbank offer' 'Effectiveness of the second Calderbank letter with non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses']
Ratio Decidendi
Indemnity costs are awarded from 4 April 2023 because the first Calderbank letter was a genuine offer of compromise, and rejection of the offer was unreasonable, given the outcome was less favourable to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Previous costs order varied to award indemnity costs after 4 April 2023; proceedings dismissed.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff shall pay 80% of the defendants' costs of these proceedings on the ordinary basis up to 4 April 2023 and thereafter pay 80 % of the defendant's costs on the indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment