Silverwater Estate Pty Ltd v Auburn Council [2001] NSWLEC 80
The Court rejected the submission for deferred commencement because the issues raised did not pertain to satisfaction concerning the development itself, and the Court proceeded on the basis of validity of earlier consent; clerical errors were corrected pursuant to the slip rule.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings / Post Judgment; Correction of Clerical Errors; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Submission for deferred commencement rejected; clerical errors corrected; parties satisfied with orders and conditions; no immediate stay granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'deferred Commencement Condition' 'correction of Clerical Errors (slip Rule)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings / Post Judgment; Correction of Clerical Errors; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should defer commencement of consent under s 80(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether clerical mistakes in the judgment should be corrected pursuant to Pt 10 r 7 of the Land and Environment Court Rules 1996']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court rejected the submission for deferred commencement because the issues raised did not pertain to satisfaction concerning the development itself, and the Court proceeded on the basis of validity of earlier consent; clerical errors were corrected pursuant to the slip rule.
Court Disposition
Submission for deferred commencement rejected; clerical errors corrected; parties satisfied with orders and conditions; no immediate stay granted.
Orders
- ['Judgment corrected by amendment of specified paragraphs under Pt 10 r 7 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996' 'Submission for deferred commencement condition under s 80(3) EP&A Act rejected' 'Declined to grant immediate stay of orders granting consent']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment