Arraj v Sime Darby Motors Retail Australia Pty Ltd t/as Parramatta BMW (No. 2) [2024] NSWDC 226

Arraj v Sime Darby Motors Retail Australia Pty Ltd t/as Parramatta BMW (No. 2) [2024] NSWDC 226

The court found that BMW Australia Ltd incurred reasonable loss and expense in complying with the broad and detailed subpoena and that the bulk of the legal fees claimed were necessary and justified. Specific entries relating to the actual process of compliance were allowed, while those relating only to costs correspondence or post-compliance activities were excluded. A deduction of $4,000 was also applied to reflect correspondence with joint purpose. The reasonable sum ordered was $14,601 under r 33.11 UCPR, plus costs of the motion.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Relating to Costs of Compliance With Subpoena in Civil Proceedings / Post Trial Procedural Ruling
Outcome
Order for plaintiff to pay reasonable loss and expense of subpoena compliance in the amount of $14,601 to BMW Australia Ltd, and to pay costs of BMW Australia Ltd of and incidental to the Notice of Motion.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'subpoena Compliance' 'third Party Costs' 'quantum Dispute']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'subpoena Compliance' 'third Party Costs' 'quantum Dispute']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Relating to Costs of Compliance With Subpoena in Civil Proceedings / Post Trial Procedural Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What is the reasonable loss or expense incurred by BMW Australia Ltd in complying with the subpoena issued by the plaintiff?' 'What principles govern the fixing of costs for compliance with a subpoena under r 33.11 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)?']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that BMW Australia Ltd incurred reasonable loss and expense in complying with the broad and detailed subpoena and that the bulk of the legal fees claimed were necessary and justified. Specific entries relating to the actual process of compliance were allowed, while those relating only to costs correspondence or post-compliance activities were excluded. A deduction of $4,000 was also applied to reflect correspondence with joint purpose. The reasonable sum ordered was $14,601 under r 33.11 UCPR, plus costs of the motion.

Court Disposition

Order for plaintiff to pay reasonable loss and expense of subpoena compliance in the amount of $14,601 to BMW Australia Ltd, and to pay costs of BMW Australia Ltd of and incidental to the Notice of Motion.

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to r 33.11 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), order the plaintiff to pay BMW Australia Ltd the amount of $14,601 for reasonable loss or expense incurred in complying with the subpoena issued by the plaintiff.' 'Order the plaintiff to pay the costs of BMW Australia Pty Ltd of and incidental...