Brierley v Anthony Charles Reeves T/as Kaplan Reeves & Co & Ors [2000] NSWSC 305
The application for assessment was not 'made' until all statutory requirements, including payment or waiver of the prescribed fee, were satisfied. As the waiver was not granted until after the limitation period, the application was out of time and the appeal must fail.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Simon Brierley; First Defendant: Anthony Charles Reeves T/as Kaplan Reeves & Co; Second Defendant: John Turnbull; Third Defendant: Brian Murray
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Determination of Costs Assessor / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Application for Assessment of Costs, Limitation Periods, Waiver of Filing Fee, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Brierley
Plaintiff
Anthony Charles Reeves T/as Kaplan Reeves & Co
First Defendant
John Turnbull
Second Defendant
Brian Murray
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Determination of Costs Assessor / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for assessment of costs was out of time
- 2 When an application for assessment is 'made' under Legal Profession Act 1987 and Regulations
- 3 Whether waiver of filing fee was validly granted prior to expiry of limitation period
Ratio Decidendi
The application for assessment was not 'made' until all statutory requirements, including payment or waiver of the prescribed fee, were satisfied. As the waiver was not granted until after the limitation period, the application was out of time and the appeal must fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Summons dismissed
- Plaintiff to pay costs of the proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment