Oldham v Lloyd [2017] NSWSC 87
There was no admissible evidence to demonstrate that the foreign costs judgment was obtained by fraud as required under s 7(2)(a)(vi) of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth). Until the original judgment in England is set aside, there is no basis for the setting aside of the registration of the costs judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Registration of Foreign Costs Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed. Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the Motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgments' 'fraud in Obtaining Judgments' 'staying Enforcement of Foreign Judgments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Registration of Foreign Costs Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the registration of a foreign costs judgment should be set aside on grounds of fraud' 'Whether enforcement of the foreign costs judgment should be stayed']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no admissible evidence to demonstrate that the foreign costs judgment was obtained by fraud as required under s 7(2)(a)(vi) of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (Cth). Until the original judgment in England is set aside, there is no basis for the setting aside of the registration of the costs judgment.
Court Disposition
Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed. Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the Motion.
Orders
- ["Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 6 December 2016 dismissed." "Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of the Motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment