Grunsell v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1130
The adverse credit finding against the applicant was illogical and infected the consideration of core issues; as a result, the decision at first instance is unreliable, warranting remittal of the matter for rehearing before another judge and allowing the extension of time and appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Grunsell; First Respondent: Ceerose Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Edward Doueihi; Third Respondent: Bradley Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; extension of time granted; matter remitted for rehearing before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Pay, Fair Work Act, Procedural Fairness, Extension of Time, Appeal Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Grunsell
Applicant
Ceerose Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Edward Doueihi
Second Respondent
Bradley Smith
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to redundancy pay under s 119 of the Fair Work Act
- 2 Whether procedural fairness was afforded at the original trial
- 3 Whether adverse credit findings against the applicant were reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The adverse credit finding against the applicant was illogical and infected the consideration of core issues; as a result, the decision at first instance is unreliable, warranting remittal of the matter for rehearing before another judge and allowing the extension of time and appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; extension of time granted; matter remitted for rehearing before a different judge.
Orders
- The application for an extension of time be granted.
- The appeal be allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment