Ishaq v R [2023] NSWCCA 178
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the aggregate sentence reflected appropriate concurrency and took into account objective and subjective seriousness, statutory aggravating features, and the inherent leniency of an ICO. Value of goods sold was only one factor. Appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'dealing With Identification Information' 'recklessly Dealing With Proceeds of Crime' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'intensive Correction Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Appropriateness of indicative and aggregate sentences for offences under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)' 'Factors relevant to objective and subjective seriousness of offending' 'Correct approach to aggregate sentencing and indicative sentences']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the aggregate sentence reflected appropriate concurrency and took into account objective and subjective seriousness, statutory aggravating features, and the inherent leniency of an ICO. Value of goods sold was only one factor. Appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment