Binks v North Sydney Council & Anor [2001] NSWSC 27
The plaintiff's lack of memory of the accident, coupled with incomplete documents produced on subpoena and the necessity for specific information within the defendants' knowledge, constitute special reasons under Part 23 r 5 SCR. The plaintiff is entitled to specific discovery as requested in the notice of motion.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Simon John Binks; First Defendant: North Sydney Council; Second Defendant: Bob Maitland Pty Ltd formerly known as A G Maitland Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for discovery granted in accordance with notice of motion as amended; costs are costs in the cause; interrogatories stood over generally with liberty to restore on 7 days notice.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Special Reasons for Discovery in Personal Injury, Negligence in Roadworks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon John Binks
Plaintiff
North Sydney Council
First Defendant
Bob Maitland Pty Ltd formerly known as A G Maitland Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special reasons exist to justify general and specific discovery in a personal injury claim under Part 23 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules
- 2 Relevance and necessity of documents relating to roadworks, signage, and management for plaintiff's expert report
- 3 Adequacy of documents produced on subpoena
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's lack of memory of the accident, coupled with incomplete documents produced on subpoena and the necessity for specific information within the defendants' knowledge, constitute special reasons under Part 23 r 5 SCR. The plaintiff is entitled to specific discovery as requested in the notice of motion.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for discovery granted in accordance with notice of motion as amended; costs are costs in the cause; interrogatories stood over generally with liberty to restore on 7 days notice.
Orders
- Orders in accordance with paragraph (1) of the notice of motion filed 14 November 2000; paragraph 1(a) is to date from 1 January 1994.
- Costs are costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment