Simon Konstantinidis v Theo Baloglow & Ors [2000] NSWSC 1229

Simon Konstantinidis v Theo Baloglow & Ors [2000] NSWSC 1229

The Court preferred Mr Roth's evidence about the 28 July 1999 meeting and found that the plaintiff and the first defendant authorised their solicitors to reach a concluded agreement. The handwritten document recorded the terms of an agreement by which the parties intended to be immediately bound, with any later deed to be a fuller and more precise form not different in effect. The document was checked and accepted by the first defendant's solicitor, and the later 5 August 1999 letter to the Receiver acknowledged the terms and conditions between the parties. The handwritten document, alone and in any event together with the correspondence, was a sufficient note or memorandum satisfying s...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of a Contract / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Binding and enforceable agreement found; plaintiff entitled to specific performance.
Legal Topics
['formation of Binding Agreement' 'specific Performance' 'authority of Solicitors to Settle' 'sufficient Memorandum or Note' 'conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw) Ss 23 C and 54 A']
['contracts' 'equity' 'property Law' 'partnership'] ['formation of Binding Agreement' 'specific Performance' 'authority of Solicitors to Settle' 'sufficient Memorandum or Note' 'conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw) Ss 23 C and 54 A']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Proceedings Seeking Specific Performance of a Contract / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff and the first defendant reached a binding agreement on 28 July 1999.' "Whether the parties' solicitors were authorised to reach a concluded agreement." 'Whether the alleged agreement was too uncertain or lacked an intention to be immediately binding.' 'Whether the agreement was unenforceable by reason of ss 23C and 54A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW).' 'Whether the handwritten document, alone or with later correspondence, was a sufficient memorandum or note of the agreement.' 'Whether the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court preferred Mr Roth's evidence about the 28 July 1999 meeting and found that the plaintiff and the first defendant authorised their solicitors to reach a concluded agreement. The handwritten document recorded the terms of an agreement by which the parties intended to be immediately bound, with any later deed to be a fuller and more precise form not different in effect. The document was checked and accepted by the first defendant's solicitor, and the later 5 August 1999 letter to the Receiver acknowledged the terms and conditions between the parties. The handwritten document, alone and in any event together with the correspondence, was a sufficient note or memorandum satisfying s...

Court Disposition

Binding and enforceable agreement found; plaintiff entitled to specific performance.

Orders

  • ['Specific performance ordered.' 'The parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Order together with an agreed order as to costs.' 'If a costs order is not agreed, the Court will hear argument.']