Lauer v Comer (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 158
Given the deliberate and conspiratorial contravention of statutory protections by the builder, it was not just and equitable to allow a quantum meruit claim under s 94(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989, especially where there was no satisfactory evidence of value of the work performed, and the loss of statutory protection far outweighed any benefit obtained by the owners.
- Parties
- Appellant: Simon Lauer; Appellant: Rachel Ng; Respondent: Ike Comer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Quantum Meruit, Just and Equitable Principle, Costs Orders, Statutory Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Lauer
Appellant
Rachel Ng
Appellant
Ike Comer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was just and equitable to allow a quantum meruit under s 94(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to assess the value of work for a quantum meruit claim
- 3 Appropriate order as to costs
Ratio Decidendi
Given the deliberate and conspiratorial contravention of statutory protections by the builder, it was not just and equitable to allow a quantum meruit claim under s 94(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989, especially where there was no satisfactory evidence of value of the work performed, and the loss of statutory protection far outweighed any benefit obtained by the owners.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Appeal allowed in part.
- Order made in Tribunal below quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment